market-trends Neutral 5

WES Drops 1.62% as Oil & Gas Sector Lags S&P 500 by 4.09% in a Month

· 4 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • Western Midstream’s 1.62% daily slide highlights investor anxiety toward fossil fuel infrastructure despite solid earnings growth.
  • The energy sector’s 4.09% monthly loss contrasts with a surging broad market, signaling capital flight amid climate transition fears.
  • Rigetti Computing’s 4.47% crash adds a tech sell-off dimension.

Mentioned

Western Midstream company WES Rigetti Computing company S&P 500 index Dow Jones Industrial Average index DJI Nasdaq index Zacks Investment Research company Oils-Energy Sector sector Computer and Technology Sector sector

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Western Midstream (WES) closed at $38.80 on July 1, 2026, down 1.62%, underperforming the S&P 500’s 0.76% decline.
  2. 2Over the past month, WES fell 0.88%, the Oils-Energy sector lost 4.09%, and the S&P 500 gained 4.31%.
  3. 3Rigetti Computing (RGTI) fell 4.47% to $11.33 on the same day, while the S&P 500 lost only 0.11%.
  4. 4WES’s upcoming quarterly EPS is estimated at $0.84 (+20% YoY) and revenue at $916.7 million (+18.13%).
  5. 5RGTI is projected to report a quarterly loss of $0.06 per share on revenue of $1.91 million (−38.19% YoY).
  6. 6Analyst consensus EPS estimate for WES has been revised downward by 0.2% over the past month.

Who's Affected

Western Midstream
companyNegative
Oils-Energy Sector
sectorNegative
Renewable Energy Sector
sectorPositive
Oil & Gas Midstream Outlook

Analysis

For climate-conscious investors, Western Midstream’s 1.62% plunge is more than a market movement—it’s a distress signal for fossil fuel transport assets in a decarbonizing world. Even as WES projects a 20% EPS increase and 18% revenue growth, the Oils-Energy sector’s 4.09% monthly loss underscores a growing belief that the era of oil and gas infrastructure supremacy may be waning. This decline, coupled with a 0.2% downward analyst revision, suggests that the energy transition is beginning to erode the market’s faith in traditional midstream models.

On July 1, 2026, the U.S. equity market closed with broad-based declines, but two stocks stood out for their underperformance: Western Midstream (WES) and Rigetti Computing (RGTI). Western Midstream, a leading oil and gas transportation and storage company, ended the session at $38.80, losing 1.62%—more than double the S&P 500’s 0.76% decline. Rigetti Computing, a quantum computing pioneer, fared even worse, dropping 4.47% to $11.33 against the S&P’s 0.11% slip. These moves were not isolated; rather, they reflect sectoral headwinds that are reshaping market sentiment in mid-2026.

Upcoming quarterly results are expected to show a 20% year-over-year EPS jump to $0.84 and an 18.13% revenue surge to $916.7 million.

For WES, the deeper context is a tug-of-war between robust financial fundamentals and a skeptical energy market. Over the past month, the stock lost only 0.88%, outperforming the Oils-Energy sector’s steep 4.09% loss but seriously lagging the S&P 500’s 4.31% gain. This divergence suggests that while WES benefits from its fee-based midstream model with stable cash flows, the entire fossil-fuel value chain is under a cloud. Upcoming quarterly results are expected to show a 20% year-over-year EPS jump to $0.84 and an 18.13% revenue surge to $916.7 million. Full-year estimates are even brighter: earnings per share of $4.15, a 59.62% leap, on $3.69 billion in revenue. Yet these numbers have not prevented a 0.2% downward revision in the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate over the past month, indicating that analysts are trimming their near-term outlook despite the growth narrative. The absence of a Zacks Rank for WES in the report hints at a neutral or unrated stance, but the estimate cut aligns with broader investor unease.

Rigetti’s story is starkly different. The company is deep in pre-commercial territory, with a projected quarterly loss of $0.06 per share—an improvement from the prior year’s deeper loss—and revenue of only $1.91 million, down 38.19% year-over-year. The full-year outlook of -$0.05 per share and $8.78 million in revenue (down 18.63%) underscores the uphill battle in monetizing quantum computing. The stock’s 3.26% monthly decline is a stark contrast to the Computer and Technology sector’s 8.76% gain, suggesting investors are rotating away from speculative names even within high-growth tech. A Zacks Rank of #4 (Sell) reinforces that negative sentiment, with no upward estimate revisions to offset the sell signal.

The juxtaposition of a profitable midstream energy company and a loss-making quantum startup both falling harder than the market reveals a common thread: market participants are increasingly selective, penalizing sectors vulnerable to long-term secular risks. For WES, that risk is the energy transition away from hydrocarbons; for RGTI, it is the uncertainty of commercializing frontier technology. With the S&P 500 still near highs, such underperformance underscores that not all growth stories are equally rewarded in 2026.

What to Watch

From a market structure standpoint, the day’s trading saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average slip 0.75% while the Nasdaq shed 1.01%, indicating pressure on rate-sensitive growth assets. WES, as an energy infrastructure play, typically carries a lower beta, yet it fell more than the market, hinting at sector-specific selling rather than macro-driven moves. The fact that the Oils-Energy sector is down over 4% in a month while the broader market is up over 4% suggests a capital rotation out of traditional energy, possibly fueled by advancing climate policies, increased renewable capacity, and long-term demand uncertainty for fossil fuels.

Looking ahead, WES’s upcoming earnings report will be a critical catalyst. If the company beats estimates and provides optimistic guidance, the stock could rebound as the midstream model’s resilience once again attracts yield-seeking investors. However, if the broader energy sector continues to de-rate, even strong fundamentals may not shield WES from the headwinds. For Rigetti, quarterly results are unlikely to move the needle until there is tangible progress toward commercial revenue and a path to profitability. The diverging fortunes of these two companies illustrate how the current market is ruthlessly separating perceived safety from speculative hope, with climate and technology transitions reshaping investor strategies.

Sources

Sources

Based on 2 source articles

How we covered this story

Every story in our climate coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the climate space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.