Minnesota’s Moose Crisis: Adapting Wildlife Management to a Warming Climate

The decline of the moose in Minnesota has become one of the most visible indicators of climate change in the American Midwest. Once numbering over 8,000 in the northwestern part of the state, that population has effectively vanished, while the northeastern population has stabilized at a fraction of its historical peak. This biological crisis is not merely a matter of rising temperatures but a complex interplay of ecological shifts that are forcing state agencies and tribal nations to rethink the fundamentals of wildlife management. As the southern edge of the boreal forest retreats northward, the moose is caught in a pincer movement of physiological stress and increased predation.

Central to the survival of the next generation of moose is the management of the winter tick (Dermacentor albipictus). Historically, deep snow and early frosts killed off tick larvae before they could latch onto hosts in massive numbers. However, shorter winters and later first frosts have allowed tick populations to explode. It is now common for a single moose to host more than 50,000 ticks, leading to severe anemia, hair loss (known as 'ghost moose' syndrome), and high calf mortality. Conservationists are now exploring forest management techniques that create 'cool' microclimates—dense, old-growth coniferous stands that provide shade and lower ambient temperatures—adjacent to young forest patches that provide the high-protein forage moose need to survive the winter.

“

It is now common for a single moose to host more than 50,000 ticks, leading to severe anemia, hair loss (known as 'ghost moose' syndrome), and high calf mortality.

Tribal leadership, particularly from the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, has been instrumental in shifting the focus toward holistic ecosystem resilience. The Band has pioneered the use of GPS collar data to identify 'thermal refugia'—specific geographic areas where moose retreat during heat waves. By protecting these corridors from logging and development, managers hope to provide the species with the necessary infrastructure to withstand summer temperatures that now frequently exceed the moose’s upper critical threshold of 57 degrees Fahrenheit. When temperatures rise above this point, moose stop foraging to seek shade, leading to nutritional deficiencies that make them more susceptible to wolves and brainworm, a parasite carried by white-tailed deer.

White-tailed deer expansion is another climate-driven factor complicating moose recovery. As winters become milder, deer move further north into traditional moose territory. Deer carry a meningeal worm that is harmless to them but fatal to moose. Consequently, state policy is increasingly looking at 'deer-moose zones,' where deer populations are aggressively managed through hunting to reduce the transmission of parasites. This represents a difficult balancing act for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which must weigh the interests of deer hunters against the existential threat to the moose.

Looking forward, the survival of the Minnesota moose will likely depend on the success of 'climate-smart' forestry. This involves planting tree species that are more resilient to a warming climate, such as white pine and cedar, while using prescribed burns to mimic the natural disturbances that create moose habitat. While the long-term outlook remains challenging, the integration of indigenous ecological knowledge with high-tech tracking data offers a blueprint for how biodiversity can be managed in a period of rapid environmental transition. The moose is no longer just a resident of the forest; it is a ward of a highly managed, climate-adaptive landscape.