Climate entity

Marsh

Company MMC

Marsh is most often covered alongside APPE Padova, which appears in 2 of these 3 stories. The 39-day window averages about 0.5 stories each week. The busiest single day carried 2. The clearest coverage concentration is extreme-weather: 2 of 3 stories, with the rest divided among 1 other category.

Last mentioned: Aug 16, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Marsh

3 stories
6.7 avg impact
0% positive
67% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 67 percentage points.

  • 33% neutral
  • 67% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Marsh

Marsh is most often covered alongside APPE Padova, which appears in 2 of these 3 stories. The 39-day window averages about 0.5 stories each week. The busiest single day carried 2. The clearest coverage concentration is extreme-weather: 2 of 3 stories, with the rest divided among 1 other category. Source depth averages 2 original sources per story, versus 3.1 across the same-window beat baseline. At 6.7, the average consequence score sits above the same-window beat average of 6.1. Marsh appears in 3 tracked Climate stories published from July 9, 2026 through August 16, 2026.

Stories tracked
3
Per week
0.5
Sources per story
2

Computed from the 3 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 411 Climate stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Marsh. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Stories mentioning Marsh 3

Marsh is linked from 3 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.