1908 Swamp Cooler Still Cuts Cooling Energy Demand in Arid Climates
Ancient evaporative cooling remains a low-cost, low-energy alternative to air conditioning in dry regions as heat rises. RMI's Ankit Kalanki says where climate allows, swamp coolers can be a good solution. But humidity and water constraints limit their reach.
Beat this week
Last 7 days · Sustainability
Impact 5.3/10 (-0.2 vs prior). Counts are stories in our record, not a market forecast.
Open the change reportCoverage balance Balanced directional read. Positive and negative coverage are within 0 percentage points.
This story sits in Sustainability — the counts compare this beat's last 7 days with the previous 7 in our verified record, not a market forecast.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record (as of ) The volume change compares this window with the prior 7 days in the same record. — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.
Climate briefing
Key takeaways
- Ancient evaporative cooling remains a low-cost, low-energy alternative to air conditioning in dry regions as heat rises.
- RMI's Ankit Kalanki says where climate allows, swamp coolers can be a good solution.
- But humidity and water constraints limit their reach.
- local10.com
- news4jax.com
In this briefing
Mentioned
Key Intelligence
Key Facts
- 1Ancient civilizations fanned air over water in clay pots or jars to produce cooling, the same principle behind modern swamp coolers.
- 2Oscar Palmer perfected the first U.S. system using evaporative cooling in Arizona in 1908.
- 3By the 1930s, swamp coolers were cooling large parts of the country, including southwestern states like New Mexico and Nevada.
- 4Traditional air-conditioning units did not become standard in the U.S. until the 1950s, and central air conditioning remains a luxury.
- 5RMI principal Ankit Kalanki says evaporative coolers are a low-cost, low-energy solution 'where the climate allows.'
- 6Swamp coolers and fans fall short in humid regions because the air is already saturated and can't handle more water.
Where you don't have air conditioning and where the climate allows, evaporative coolers could be a good solution and are low cost, low energy consumption.
Associated Press interview on the continued relevance of swamp coolers
Analysis
- Low energy consumption compared to conventional air conditioning
- Low cost, expanding cooling access in arid regions
- Greater cooling effect in dry heat, such as Arizona
- Adds humidity, making it ineffective in humid regions
- Central AC remains preferred where it is available and affordable
- Water use could conflict with drought conditions in the Southwest
Analysis
As climate change drives up cooling demand and strains electricity grids, a 1908 technology is getting renewed attention from energy analysts. Evaporative or 'swamp' coolers use water-saturated pads instead of refrigerant compressors, dramatically cutting energy consumption in dry climates. For climate and energy professionals, the question is whether this low-tech solution can scale in the right regions without worsening water stress.
Swamp coolers, or evaporative coolers, have moved from an early 20th-century novelty to a durable low-energy cooling option at a moment when electricity grids are straining under rising heat. Reporting published Aug. 18, 2026, by Local10 and News4Jax draws on The Associated Press to trace how ancient cooling principles — fanning air over water in clay pots or jars — were refined in the United States into a mechanical system by Oscar Palmer in 1908 in Arizona. By the 1930s, the devices had changed entire swaths of the country, cooling southwestern states such as New Mexico and Nevada. The mechanics are simple: a fan pulls fresh hot air through vertical porous pads saturated with water; the water evaporates, cooling and humidifying the air before it is directed indoors.
Eric Verpolegen, founder of CoolVeg, a nonprofit focused on evaporative cooling for fruits and vegetables, notes that if it is really dry out in Arizona, you get a greater cooling effect.
The distinction between dry and humid air is central to the technology's value. In arid regions, evaporative cooling is highly effective. Eric Verpolegen, founder of CoolVeg, a nonprofit focused on evaporative cooling for fruits and vegetables, notes that if it is really dry out in Arizona, you get a greater cooling effect. But in humid regions, swamp coolers and fans fall short because the air is already saturated and cannot handle more water. This inherent limit is why swamp coolers never fully displaced vapor-compression air conditioning, and it matters more as experts cited in the report say humidity has been worsening in some areas. Traditional air conditioning did not become standard in the U.S. until the 1950s, and even now central air conditioning remains a luxury. Swamp coolers endure as a lower-cost, lower-energy alternative for places where the climate allows.
From a climate and energy perspective, the value proposition is significant. Vapor-compression air conditioning is a major driver of peak electricity demand, especially in the Southwest and other hot, arid regions. Evaporative coolers can reduce electricity use and peak load because they rely on a fan and water pump rather than an energy-intensive compressor. Ankit Kalanki, principal of cooling at RMI, a nonprofit dedicated to clean energy, frames the opportunity succinctly: where you don't have air conditioning and where the climate allows, evaporative coolers could be a good solution and are low cost, low energy consumption. This makes swamp coolers relevant not only for carbon-conscious cooling but also for cooling access equity, off-grid or under-electrified settings, and low-income households in dry climates.
Yet the technology carries trade-offs. Evaporative coolers use water continuously, which can conflict with drought conditions in the southwestern states where they work best. They also add humidity to indoor air, limiting their use in the increasingly humid conditions that climate change may be bringing to some historically dry regions. The report does not introduce a new product or company, but it resurfaces historical understanding to inform today's adaptation debate. It illustrates how low-tech, passive or semi-passive cooling can complement high-efficiency air conditioners and heat pumps rather than compete with them.
What to Watch
The enduring use of swamp coolers in desert-like states helps explain why building codes and utility programs in places like Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico often treat evaporative cooling as a legitimate efficiency measure. However, the lack of precise energy savings, water use, and humidity data in the reporting points to a need for more rigorous evaluation. Utilities and policymakers would benefit from standardized performance metrics that compare evaporative coolers to conventional AC under different climate scenarios.
Looking forward, as global temperatures continue rising and cooling demand climbs, swamp coolers may see renewed policy attention if they can be integrated with smart controls, improved pad materials, and water recycling. Indirect evaporative coolers and hybrid systems that pair evaporative pre-cooling with conventional AC could deliver comfort with lower energy use, particularly in transitional climates. The challenge will be matching deployments to regions where humidity and water availability do not undermine performance. If humidity increases in historically dry areas, the geographic window for swamp coolers could narrow. For climate professionals, the takeaway is not that swamp coolers are a silver bullet, but that a 1908 technology still offers a viable, low-energy cooling strategy at the margins of a warming grid.
Source cluster
Primary reporting
Cite This Page
"1908 Swamp Cooler Still Cuts Cooling Energy Demand in Arid Climates." Climate Intelligence Brief, August 18, 2026. https://getclimatebrief.com/story/swamp-cooler-1908-design-climate-energy-dry-regions
How we covered this story
Every story in our climate coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.
Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the climate space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.
Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.
| Signal on this page | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Verified by N sources | Independent corroboration count. N≥2 is our confidence floor; N=1 is marked explicitly. |
| Impact score (1-10) | Regulatory + financial + operational weight. 8+ signals an experienced-operator action item. |
| Sentiment | Five-tier classification trained on labeled climate-specific corpora. |
| Timeline | Where applicable, the related-events sequence that contextualizes today's development. |