Lithium Demand to Triple by 2040, Energy Transition at Risk – IEA
Achieving global climate goals hinges on minerals that are in dangerously short supply, according to the IEA. Lithium demand will more than triple and copper demand will swell by over 25%, yet severe supply gaps and China’s refining lock threaten to slow EV and renewable adoption.
Key Takeaways
- Achieving global climate goals hinges on minerals that are in dangerously short supply, according to the IEA.
- Lithium demand will more than triple and copper demand will swell by over 25%, yet severe supply gaps and China’s refining lock threaten to slow EV and renewable adoption.
Mentioned
Key Intelligence
Key Facts
- 1Total mining and refining investment needed by 2040 under STEPS surpasses $750 billion, with copper requiring $310 billion and nickel $280 billion.
- 2Lithium demand is projected to more than triple by 2040; graphite demand doubles; nickel demand rises 65%; rare earth demand grows 50%; copper demand climbs over 25%.
- 3Supply gaps for copper and lithium are expected to persist through 2035, while a new gap for cobalt emerges due to DRC export quotas.
- 4China dominates downstream processing: ~50% of copper refining, 70% of lithium refining, 75% of cobalt refining, 85% of rare‑earth separation, and 90%+ of battery‑grade graphite.
- 5Recycling is set to double its share, with average recycling rates rising from ~10% currently to nearly 20% by 2040.
- 6Mining project pipelines are diversifying geographically, but refining and cathode-material capacity outside dominant suppliers remains considerably smaller.
Critical mineral required for EV batteries and energy storage
Analysis
Climate strategies built on rapid electrification face a material reality check. The IEA’s projection that lithium demand will triple and copper will grow by over 25% by 2040 underscores that the energy transition is first and foremost a mineral transition. Supply deficits in these critical inputs risk derailing climate timelines, making immediate action on refining diversification, recycling, and sustainable mining as urgent as emissions targets themselves.
The International Energy Agency’s latest Global Critical Minerals Outlook delivers a stark warning: demand for minerals essential to the clean energy transition and modern electronics will surge dramatically by 2040, while supply-side vulnerabilities—especially in refining—threaten to create persistent gaps. Under its Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS), total investment in mining and refining must exceed $750 billion between now and 2040 to keep pace. This figure is dominated by copper ($310 billion) and nickel ($280 billion), reflecting their central roles in electrification, batteries, and infrastructure. The report projects lithium demand to more than triple by 2040, graphite demand to double, and nickel demand to rise 65%. Rare earth elements, critical for permanent magnets in wind turbines and EV motors, will see roughly 50% growth, while copper demand climbs over 25%, adding around 7 million tonnes. These numbers underpin the IEA’s bottom line: the world is not prepared for the scale of mineral extraction and processing needed.
The report highlights that China accounts for just under 50% of global copper refining, 70% of lithium refining, 75% of cobalt refining, 85% of magnet rare-earth separation, and over 90% of battery-grade graphite production.
The supply side reveals a complex picture. On mining, a growing project pipeline offers some hope, but the IEA points to persistent supply gaps for copper and lithium extending through 2035. A new gap for cobalt has emerged, driven by export quotas introduced by the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which dominates global cobalt production. Nickel’s supply outlook has tightened compared with last year’s assessment. Yet the most acute vulnerability lies downstream. While mining investment is becoming more geographically diversified, refining and downstream processing remain extraordinarily concentrated in China. The report highlights that China accounts for just under 50% of global copper refining, 70% of lithium refining, 75% of cobalt refining, 85% of magnet rare-earth separation, and over 90% of battery-grade graphite production. This concentration creates a systemic choke point: even if new mines come online, a lack of refining capacity outside China could bottleneck supply and expose the world to geopolitical shocks.
The implications for markets and industries are profound. A structural supply deficit in copper and lithium would translate into sustained upward price pressure, increasing input costs for electric vehicle manufacturers, battery producers, and renewable energy developers. For automakers racing to electrify their fleets, the availability of affordable battery-grade lithium, nickel, and cobalt is existential. Companies that fail to secure long-term offtake agreements or invest in recycling and alternative chemistries may find themselves unable to meet production targets. The refining concentration also raises the specter of export controls or tariffs, as seen in rare earths in the past, which could suddenly disrupt global supply chains.
What to Watch
Recycling is positioned as a critical counterbalance. Under STEPS, the IEA expects secondary supply to roughly double its share, with average recycling rates rising from around 10% today to nearly 20% by 2040. While this alleviates some pressure, it is not a near-term fix; recycling infrastructure and battery collection systems require years to scale, and the volumes will only become meaningful once a large fleet of end-of-life EVs emerges. The report underscores the need for timely policies that reduce investment risk and support refining diversification outside dominant suppliers. Without such measures, the clean energy transition faces a material foundation that is both geologically and geopolitically fragile.
Looking ahead, the IEA’s analysis serves as a convergence point for industrial policy, energy security, and climate ambition. Governments in North America, Europe, and Asia are already rolling out incentives and subsidies to build domestic refining capacity and secure critical mineral supply chains, but the $750 billion investment figure highlights the enormous capital gap. The report also implicitly warns that the current pace of permitting, community opposition, and capital allocation is too slow. For investors, the data points to a long-term supercycle in mining and mineral processing, with copper, lithium, and graphite at the forefront. For policymakers, it’s a clarion call to treat mineral supply chains with the same strategic urgency as energy sources themselves.
Cite This Page
"Lithium Demand to Triple by 2040, Energy Transition at Risk – IEA." Climate Intelligence Brief, August 1, 2026. https://getclimatebrief.com/story/lithium-demand-triples-2040-iea-climate
From the Network
How we covered this story
Every story in our climate coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.
Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the climate space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.
Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.
| Signal on this page | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Verified by N sources | Independent corroboration count. N≥2 is our confidence floor; N=1 is marked explicitly. |
| Impact score (1-10) | Regulatory + financial + operational weight. 8+ signals an experienced-operator action item. |
| Sentiment | Five-tier classification trained on labeled climate-specific corpora. |
| Timeline | Where applicable, the related-events sequence that contextualizes today's development. |