Sustainability Neutral 5

Globe's 2nd Consecutive CDP 'A' Rating Drives Climate Action in Telecom Supply Chains

· 4 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • By retaining its CDP Supplier Engagement 'A' rating, Globe demonstrates that climate disclosure and Scope 3 engagement are core to its strategy.
  • The company is upskilling suppliers and using AI to track emissions, setting a new standard for telecom climate leadership.

Mentioned

Globe Telecom company GLO CDP organization Yoly Crisanto person

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Globe maintained its CDP Supplier Engagement 'A' rating for the second consecutive year in the 2025 assessment cycle, announced June 2026.
  2. 2The CDP SEA evaluates companies on governance, targets, Scope 3 emissions management, and value chain engagement.
  3. 3Globe integrates ESG criteria into procurement for retail electricity, network equipment, and product packaging suppliers.
  4. 4AI-driven data capture is used to monitor supplier ESG credentials, performance, and attributes across the value chain.
  5. 5The company conducts capability-building programs to equip suppliers with sustainability knowledge and align them with its climate roadmap.
  6. 6Globe's Supplier Code of Ethics commits partners to the company's climate action roadmap, embedding sustainability into procurement.
Climate Action Sentiment

Analysis

As pressure mounts for corporations to tackle Scope 3 emissions, Globe's second straight CDP 'A' rating signals that climate leadership now extends deep into the supply chain. This achievement highlights the telecom sector's often-overlooked downstream influence on climate action, with Globe using its purchasing power to accelerate decarbonization across Southeast Asia.

Globe, a leading Philippine telecommunications company, has maintained its 'A' rating in the CDP Supplier Engagement Assessment (SEA) for the second consecutive year, as announced on June 25, 2026. This recognition underscores the company's deepening integration of climate and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria into its procurement and supplier management processes, moving beyond direct operations to influence value chain sustainability. The CDP SEA rating places Globe among the 'Supplier Engagement Leaders,' a status reserved for companies that demonstrate strong performance across governance, targets, Scope 3 emissions management, and value chain engagement. Achieving a top rating two years in a row signals not only compliance but a strategic embedding of sustainability into procurement decisions—a shift that reflects broader industry trends where supply chain emissions increasingly define corporate climate credibility.

As pressure mounts for corporations to tackle Scope 3 emissions, Globe's second straight CDP 'A' rating signals that climate leadership now extends deep into the supply chain.

For context, CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) runs a global disclosure system for environmental impact, and its Supplier Engagement rating is particularly scrutinized by investors and large buyers seeking to mitigate climate risk across supply chains. In a world where Scope 3 emissions often represent the bulk of a company's carbon footprint, supplier engagement is no longer optional. Globe's continued 'A' rating places it in a select group of companies worldwide that are actively leveraging their purchasing power to drive climate action. The company's approach includes a Supplier Code of Ethics that explicitly aligns partners with its climate action roadmap, ESG screening for electricity providers, network equipment suppliers, and packaging vendors, and the use of AI-driven data capture to monitor supplier ESG credentials and performance. This framework not only reduces environmental risk but also enhances supply chain resilience by identifying potential sustainability-related disruptions.

Yoly Crisanto, Globe's Chief Sustainability and Corporate Communications Officer, emphasized that the rating reflects 'unwavering commitment to environmental transparency and collective climate action,' adding that the company is 'turning our climate ambitions into measurable impact.' This statement highlights the shift from commitment to action, with Globe conducting capability-building programs to equip suppliers with foundational sustainability knowledge. Such initiatives are critical in emerging markets like the Philippines, where supplier maturity on ESG issues can vary widely. By investing in supplier education, Globe is essentially de-risking its value chain and future-proofing against tightening global regulations on carbon disclosure and human rights due diligence.

The implications for the supply chain and climate sectors are substantial. For supply chain professionals, Globe's model demonstrates how to operationalize ESG integration beyond policy statements—using AI tools for data capture and embedding criteria into procurement platforms. This can inspire other companies in Southeast Asia to adopt similar digital monitoring systems. For climate advocates, the focus on Scope 3 shows that telecommunications companies, which are often seen as relatively low-emission operators, are acknowledging their broader footprint through purchased goods and services. Globe's actions could accelerate industry-wide shifts toward supplier engagement standards.

What to Watch

Looking ahead, Globe's sustained high rating may influence investor sentiment and access to sustainability-linked financing. The company's parent ticker GLO on the Philippine Stock Exchange may see increased ESG investor interest, as funds increasingly screen for CDP performance. Moreover, with global frameworks like the EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) coming into force, companies with robust supplier engagement programs will be better positioned to comply. Globe's proactive stance likely reduces legal and reputational risks while enhancing its brand as a responsible corporate citizen.

However, the real test will be translating this rating into verifiable emission reductions across its supply base. While the 'A' rating indicates excellent disclosure and governance, it does not guarantee absolute emission cuts. Future reports will need to show concrete metrics on supplier emission reductions, increased use of renewable energy, and measurable ESG improvements among partners. Globe's use of AI in monitoring offers a scalable model, but data quality and supplier willingness to share information remain challenges. Overall, the announcement reinforces that supply chain collaboration is becoming a competitive differentiator in sustainability, and Globe is staking a leadership position in the region.

Sources

Sources

Based on 2 source articles

Cite This Page

"Globe's 2nd Consecutive CDP 'A' Rating Drives Climate Action in Telecom Supply Chains." Climate Intelligence Brief, June 25, 2026. https://getclimatebrief.com/story/globe-2nd-cdp-a-climate-action-suppliers

How we covered this story

Every story in our climate coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the climate space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.