Zero New Licences? Burnham's Climate Credibility at Stake Over North Sea Oil

For climate advocates, Andy Burnham's premiership begins with a defining test: will he honour Labour's manifesto pledge to ban new North Sea oil and gas licences, or will he bow to industry pressure? The choice could set the UK's trajectory towards net-zero for years to come, with potentially devastating consequences for global climate efforts if a major economy backslides on fossil fuel commitments.

As Andy Burnham steps into 10 Downing Street on Monday, July 20, 2026, a defining test of his premiership already looms: whether he will honour the Labour Party's 2024 manifesto pledge to issue no new North Sea oil and gas licences. Reports that the incoming prime minister is "open-minded" about approving new drilling have triggered a sharp rebuke from climate campaigners and the Green Party, placing energy policy at the centre of his first days in office. The manifesto, crafted under former leader Keir Starmer, was explicit, arguing that new licences would "not take a penny off bills, or improve our energy security," while accelerating climate change. Burnham has publicly promised to adhere to that platform, but the political calculus has shifted. A lobbying campaign in the week leading up to his accession, including an open letter from energy industry leaders and trade union bosses, urged Labour MPs to back domestic fossil fuel expansion. Proponents claim that ramping up North Sea output would reduce reliance on imports from "volatile regions" where extraction practices carry higher emissions, making it a "more responsible choice for the climate."

“

Even with generous tax breaks, new fields often require oil prices above $70 per barrel to break even, a level that market volatility cannot guarantee.

However, a sober analysis of the UK's oil market undercuts that case. The United Kingdom already exports the majority of its North Sea crude, meaning additional production is more likely to be sold on global markets than to flow into domestic refineries or to lower British household bills. Moreover, the global oil price is set by international supply and demand dynamics; incremental barrels from the North Sea are too marginal to move the needle. Extraction costs in the basin, already among the highest in the world due to mature fields and decommissioning liabilities, further undermine the economic argument. Even with generous tax breaks, new fields often require oil prices above $70 per barrel to break even, a level that market volatility cannot guarantee. From a climate perspective, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the International Energy Agency have repeatedly stated that no new fossil fuel developments are compatible with a net-zero pathway, a conclusion endorsed by the UK's own Climate Change Committee.